Description: <DIV STYLE="text-align:Left;"><DIV><DIV><P STYLE="margin:0 0 6 0;"><SPAN><SPAN>A table exported from the PLUS database joins onto the PLUS ZED Records Production feature class, adding the following information: applicant name, current status, date of status, and date filed. Additional PLUS information may be added in the future if requested. </SPAN></SPAN></P><P STYLE="margin:0 0 6 0;"><SPAN><SPAN>PLUS data must have one of these current statuses: In Review, Deferred Indefinitely, Major Revision Requested, Review in Progress See Parent, Waiting for Resubmission, Ready for Hearing, PC Action, BOS Action, BZA Action. </SPAN></SPAN></P><P STYLE="margin:0 0 6 0;"><SPAN><SPAN>Zoning application types include Rezonings, Plan Amendments, Special Exceptions, Special Permits, and Variances. </SPAN></SPAN></P><P STYLE="margin:0 0 6 0;"><SPAN><SPAN>Contact: Fairfax County Department of Planning and Development</SPAN></SPAN></P><P STYLE="margin:0 0 6 0;"><SPAN><SPAN>Data accessibility: Publicly available. </SPAN></SPAN></P><P STYLE="margin:0 0 6 0;"><SPAN><SPAN>Update Frequency: Weekly, on Mondays. </SPAN></SPAN></P><P STYLE="margin:0 0 6 0;"><SPAN><SPAN>Last revision date: September 6, 2022.</SPAN></SPAN></P><P STYLE="margin:0 0 6 0;"><SPAN><SPAN>Creation Date: 9/6/2022</SPAN></SPAN></P><P STYLE="margin:0 0 6 0;"><SPAN><SPAN>Feature Dataset Name: N/A</SPAN></SPAN></P><P STYLE="margin:0 0 6 0;"><SPAN>Layer Name: DPDMGR.PENDING_ZONING_APPLICATIONS</SPAN></P><P STYLE="margin:0 0 6 0;"><SPAN /></P></DIV></DIV></DIV>
Copyright Text: Fairfax County Department of Planning & Development
Color:
[168, 56, 0, 255] Background Color: N/A Outline Color: N/A Vertical Alignment: bottom Horizontal Alignment: left Right to Left: false Angle: 0 XOffset: 0 YOffset: 0 Size: 6 Font Family: Times New Roman Font Style: normal Font Weight: bold Font Decoration: none
Min. Scale: 36113.0 Max. Scale: 0.0 Label Placement: esriServerLinePlacementCenterAlong Label Expression: [FULLNAME] Use Coded Values: true Symbol:
Color:
[168, 56, 0, 255] Background Color: N/A Outline Color: N/A Vertical Alignment: bottom Horizontal Alignment: left Right to Left: false Angle: 0 XOffset: 0 YOffset: 0 Size: 10 Font Family: Times New Roman Font Style: normal Font Weight: bold Font Decoration: none
FFX_CLASS
(
type: esriFieldTypeString, alias: FFX_CLASS, length: 4
,
Coded Values:
[EXP: EXPRESSWAY (ALWAYS DIVIDED WITH A CONTINUOUS WIDE GRASSY MEDIAN, FOUR TO EIGHT LANES, NO ABUTTING LAND USE, FEW SIGNALS OR INTERSECTIONS, NO STOP SIGNS)]
,
[FRE: FREEWAY (INTERSTATE, LIMITED ACCESS, FOUR OR MORE LANES, NO ABUTTING LAND USE, NO SIGNALS OR AT GRADE INTERSECTIONS)]
,
[PKY: PARKWAY (MOSTLY LIMITED ACCESS, USUALLY DIVIDED, TWO TO FOUR LANES, NO TRUCKS, SHARPER CURVES AND GRADES THAN FREEWAY, NO SIGNALS OR STOP SIGNS)]
, ...11 more...
)
Color:
[169, 0, 230, 255] Background Color: N/A Outline Color: N/A Vertical Alignment: bottom Horizontal Alignment: center Right to Left: false Angle: 0 XOffset: 0 YOffset: 0 Size: 14 Font Family: Times New Roman Font Style: normal Font Weight: bold Font Decoration: none
Color:
[38, 115, 0, 255] Background Color: N/A Outline Color: N/A Vertical Alignment: bottom Horizontal Alignment: center Right to Left: false Angle: 0 XOffset: 0 YOffset: 0 Size: 24 Font Family: Times New Roman Font Style: normal Font Weight: bold Font Decoration: none
Color:
[0, 92, 230, 255] Background Color: N/A Outline Color: N/A Vertical Alignment: bottom Horizontal Alignment: center Right to Left: false Angle: 0 XOffset: 0 YOffset: 0 Size: 14 Font Family: Times New Roman Font Style: normal Font Weight: bold Font Decoration: none
Color:
[230, 76, 0, 255] Background Color: N/A Outline Color: N/A Vertical Alignment: bottom Horizontal Alignment: center Right to Left: false Angle: 0 XOffset: 0 YOffset: 0 Size: 14 Font Family: Times New Roman Font Style: normal Font Weight: bold Font Decoration: none
Description: This layer contains the boundaries of special tax areas as defined by the taxing authority of Fairfax County. These are special tax districts where additional fees are levied on the properties within the districts.Special notes:Phase 1 Dulles Rail Transportation Improvement District- This special tax district operates on a levy of $0.19 per $100 assessed value on commercial and industrial zoned property (including commercial apartments), or property used for commercial or industrial purposes within the district. This tax levy does not apply to residential property. This transportation improvement district was approved by the Board of Supervisors at the June 21, 2004 Board Meeting. Phase 2 Dulles Rail Transportation Improvement District– This special tax district has a tax rate of $0.20 per $100 assessed value on commercial and industrial zoned property (including commercial apartments), or property used for commercial or industrial purposes within the district. This tax levy does not apply to residential property. This transportation improvement district was approved by the Board of Supervisor at the December 21, 2009 board meeting.
Copyright Text: The data set was created by Analytical Surveys Incorporated (ASI) and Landata under contract to Fairfax County. Quality control checks were performed by Engineering Systems Incorporated and Dewberry and Davis. Staff from the GIS branch were also used for quality control checking.
Description: THIS LAYER HAS BEEN UPDATED TO INCLUDE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT 2013-18 ADOPTED BY THE BOS MARCH 24, 2015 This layer contains the definitive boundaries of Fairfax County's: Urban Center, Suburban Centers, Community Business Centers, Transit Station Areas, Industrial Areas, and Large Institutional Land Areas as defined in the Concept for Future Development map that appears in the Comprehensive Plan Area Plan texts. Two other types of place: Suburban Neighborhoods and Low Density Residential Areas are depicted on a separate SDE layer, DPZMGR:RESIDENTIAL_AREAS_CONCEPTUAL
Copyright Text: Created and maintained by the Planning Division of the Office of Comprehensive Planning.
Description: This layer was constructed by combining several intermediate layers which were developed in April 2010 from a database constructed several years earlier by DPZ staff. On this layer almost all features are shown as planimetric shapes. A few features are shown as 220-foot diameter circles placed as closely as possible over the center of the feature. In the table, a show_as_point column identifies these features with a "yes." There are also 5 linear-style features expressed as polygons. These are roads shown as 125-foot wide buffers following the centerline of the inventoried feature. All features appear only once in the layer except for Great Falls Park Historic District Park, which is split into two polygons, one for the portion in Upper Potomac Planning District and one for the portion in McLean Planning District.
Copyright Text: Laurie Turkawski, Linda Blank, Indrani Sistla, Harry Rado, all on staff at Fairfax County Department of Planning & Zoning.
Description: The Laurel Hill MOA area is treated like a historic overlay district, but is not currently in the Historic Overlay District Layer. This layer supports the Heritage Resources group for Fairfax County to help maintain the historic character of the surronding area.Contact: Daniel WhiteData Accessibility: Publicly availableUpdate frequency: As neededCreation date: 7/15/2002Feature Set: DPZMGR.HISTORIC_AREASFeature Layer: DPZMGR.LAURELHILL_HISTORIC_MOAMEMORANDUM OF AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION (GSA), THE BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT (BLM), THE COUNTY OF FAIRFAX, VIRGINIA (THE COUNTY), THE FAIRFAX COUNTY PARK AUTHORITY (FCPA), THE FAIRFAX COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS (FCPS), THE FEDERATION OF LORTON COMMUNITIES (FOLC), THE LORTON HERITAGE SOCIETY (LHS), THE NORTHERN VIRGINIA REGIONAL PARK AUTHORITY (NVRPA), THE VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF HISTORIC RESOURCES (VDHR), AND THE ADVISORY COUNCIL ON HISTORIC PRESERVATION (THE COUNCIL).
Copyright Text: The geographic data layers produced by the Government of Fairfax County, Virginia (“Fairfax County”), and any associated maps and applications, are provided as a public resource. While every reasonable effort is made to ensure the accuracy and completeness of the data, Fairfax County makes no warranties, expressed or implied, concerning the accuracy, completeness or suitability of its data, and it should not be construed or used as a legal description.
Pursuant to Section 54.1-402 of the Code of Virginia, any determination of topography or contours, or any depiction of physical improvements, property lines or boundaries is for general information only and shall not be used for the design, modification, or construction of improvements to real property or for flood plain determination.
Copyright by Fairfax County. Except as provided herein, all rights are reserved. Authorization to reproduce material for internal or personal use by any user of this information is granted by Fairfax County, the copyright owner.
This product is for informational purposes and may not have been prepared for, or be suitable for legal, engineering, or surveying purposes. Users of this information should review or consult with Fairfax County and information sources to ascertain the usability of the information including but not limited to Parcels, Chesapeake Bay Preservation Areas, Flood Plains etc...
Heritage Resources, DPD
https://www.fairfaxcounty.gov/planning-zoning/laurel-hill/history
https://www.fairfaxcounty.gov/planning-zoning/sites/planning-zoning/files/assets/documents/laurelhill/history/moa.pdf
Description: The Fairfax County Stormwater Easement feature dataset includes two GIS feature classes, STW_EASEMENT_POLYGONS & STW_EASEMENT_COGOLINES. These feature classes were generated from extensive plat research to derive metes & bounds to then create all easements determined to be related to stormwater management. All easements are contained within the Fairfax County boundary. The project began in the Spring of 2005 and remains in production.
Copyright Text: Dataset created for the Maintenance & Stormwater Management Division by Spatial Systems Associates, Inc & Dewberry Team
Description: Floodplain delineations were first added to the County tax maps in the 1970's for creeks and streams with watersheds of 1 square mile or greater. In 1977 all the studies on these large streams had been completed and a "Floodplain Overlay District" was created. Within several years this floodplain overlay district was depicted on the zoning maps. Again, these delineations were only for those creeks with drainage areas of over 1 square mile. A note in a 1981 memo to the Mapping Division about these delineations said, "...the County delineation of a Flood Plain Overlay District line on the tax map is treated here as a flag or general indicator of approximate location of this District's line. Normal development provides 2 field run topography professionally certified on which the floodplain elevations can be more accurately determined..." In 1985 the Zoning Ordinance was amended, an entire section on floodplains was added to Chapter 2 and the definition of what constituted a floodplain was significantly revised. Where as the Floodplain Overlay District had principally contained only those overbank areas inundated by the 100-yr storm along streams with drainage areas of 1 square mile or greater (i.e. 640 acres), the new definition included the overbank areas inundated by the 100-year storm along creeks with drainage areas of 70 acres and greater. But this change in the definition of floodplain created a problem for those who had become dependant on the tax maps to show them whether or not there was floodplain on a given property. These newly-defined floodplains were not yet studied or mapped and would only be mapped one property at a time, as each parcel containing these smaller floodplains submitted plans for development. When such parcels were developed, floodplain studies were required, and floodplain easements (later titled "floodplain and storm drainage easements") were recorded around these smaller floodplains. And as those easements were recorded, they were added to the tax maps. For all the floodplains which have been studied since 1985, the limits of the floodplain and storm drainage easements have been added to the tax maps, when such easements were required by the County Code or the Zoning Ordinance. But if a parcel has not yet been developed or if it was developed prior to 1985, there is usually no easement around the floodplain. There are also numerous cases where, for some reason, floodplain easements were recorded along small creeks with drainage areas well below 70 acres. These recorded "floodplain" easements were then added to the tax maps. THE RESULT: The tax maps cannot be used to definitively determine whether floodplain exists on a given parcel .There are approximately 900 miles of streams which meet the 70 acre drainage area requirement for floodplains, but to date (6/2003) almost 400 of these 900 miles remain unstudied. And if a stream has never been studied, no easement would have been recorded and thus the fact that it was a floodplain would not be reflected in the tax maps. Only after a determination of the drainage area is made can one know whether the overbank areas along a given creek meet the Zoning Ordinance definition of floodplain. Further if the drainage area is over 70 acres, only a floodplain study can determine the limits of the floodplain that is, how much of the overbank areas are inundated by the peak flow of the 100-yr storm. The layer for floodplains with drainage areas of over 1 square mile is good, but above that, it's inconsistent, especially in those areas which are minor floodplains (i.e. less than 360 acres of drainage area) and which were developed prior to 1985. The entire 850 or so miles of floodplain have not been mapped as unbroken corridors. And the "floodplain" here in Fairfax County, we're using the zoning ordinance definition which is the 100-yr water surface limits along streams with drainage areas of over 70 acres. This definition came into the zoning ordinance in 1985, so from that time, developers have had to study and map even these smaller floodplains on their developments and put them in easements. These easements have been captured on our tax maps since 1985, development by development, as the record plats were recorded. FEMA doesn't recognize as Special Flood Hazard Areas, many stream valleys that we would call floodplain. The layer currently on the data loader for floodplains is missing many segments of stream that are defined as floodplain per the zoning ordinance. Yet because of our zoning ordinance definition, this layer extends up in many areas far beyond where FEMA has mapped its 100-yr floodplains.
Copyright Text: ASI for conversion process, Fairfax County GIS and Mapping Services and Engineering Systems for reviewing the data, and various Fairfax County Agencies
Description: The Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) Database depicts flood risk information and supporting data used to develop the risk data. The primary risk classifications used are the 1-percent-annual-chance flood event, the 0.2-percent-annual-chance flood event, and areas of minimal flood risk. The DFIRM Database is derived from Flood Insurance Studies (FISs), previously published Flood Insurance Rate Maps (FIRMs), flood hazard analyses performed in support of the FISs and FIRMs, and new mapping data, where available. The FISs and FIRMs are published by the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). The file is georeferenced to earth's surface using the STATEPLANE projection and coordinate system. The specifications for the horizontal control of DFIRM data files are consistent with those required for mapping at a scale of 1:12,000.
Description: Soils mapped over bedrock that may contain natural asbestos. Safety precautions must be taken during construction. Asbestos identification in map grid 49-3 may be incomplete: asbestos bedrock may be present in parcel bordering areas of mapped asbestos soil. For asbestos soils in Fairfax City, please contact the City of Fairfax. Orange soils, which overlie a majority of this geology, also contain shrinking-swelling clays which can cause foundation distress.
Copyright Text: Northern Virginia Soil and Water Conservation District
Color:
[255, 0, 0, 255] Background Color: N/A Outline Color: N/A Vertical Alignment: bottom Horizontal Alignment: center Right to Left: false Angle: 0 XOffset: 0 YOffset: 0 Size: 10 Font Family: Times New Roman Font Style: normal Font Weight: bold Font Decoration: none
ZONING.JURISDICTION
(
type: esriFieldTypeString, alias: JURISDICTION, length: 20
,
Coded Values:
[FAIRFAX COUNTY: FAIRFAX COUNTY]
,
[TOWN OF VIENNA: TOWN OF VIENNA]
,
[TOWN OF HERNDON: TOWN OF HERNDON]
)