(Conservation Currents,
Northern Virginia Soil and Water Conservation District, Feb
2004)
Polluted soil poses a severe problem for both ecosystem health
and land development. Because soil lies at the confluence of
many natural systems, soil pollution can be spread to other
parts of the natural environment. Groundwater, for instance,
percolates through the soil and can carry the soil pollutants
into streams, rivers, wells and drinking water. Erosion can
create the same problem. Plants growing on polluted soil may
contain harmful levels of pollutants themselves, and this can
be passed on to the animals and people that eat them. Dust blown
from polluted soil can be inhaled directly by passersby. Additionally,
in an urban setting such as Fairfax County, polluted soil makes
valuable open land unusable for parks, recreation or commercial
development.
Despite the benefits of cleaning polluted soil, remediation
often never takes place because of the cost and effort of the
work. Both soil minerals and soil pollutants carry small electric
charges that can cause each to bond with each other, thus making
polluted soil very hard to clean. Additionally, soil is a dense
medium. This causes excavation of polluted soil for off site
treatment or disposal to be very expensive because of the time,
labor and heavy machinery necessary to do the job. Therefore,
cheaper on-site, or in-situ, remediation techniques have been
the focus of much attention and research lately. One of the
most interesting and promising of these in-situ techniques is
phytoremediation.
Phytoremediation is the use of specialized plants to clean
up polluted soil. While most plants exposed to high levels of
soil toxins will be injured or die, scientists have discovered
that certain plants are resistant, and an even smaller group
actually thrive. Both groups of plants are of interest to
researchers, but the thriving plants show a particular potential
for remediation because it has been shown that some of them
actually transport and accumulate extremely high levels of soil
pollutants within their bodies. They are therefore aptly named
hyper-accumulators.
Hyper-accumulators already are being used throughout the country
to help clean up heavy metal polluted soil. Heavy metals are
some of the most stubborn soil pollutants. They can bond very
tightly to soil particles, and they cannot be broken down by
microbial processes. Most heavy metals are also essential plant
nutrients, so plants have the ability to take up the metals
and transport them throughout their bodies. However, on polluted
soil, the levels of heavy metals are often hundreds of times
greater than normal, and this overexposure is toxic to the vast
majority of plants. Hyper-accumulators, on the other hand, actually
prefer these high concentrations. Essentially, hyper-accumulators
are acting as natural vacuum cleaners, sucking pollutants out
of the soil and depositing them in their above ground leaves
and shoots. Removing the metals is as simple as pruning or cutting
the hyper-accumulators above ground mass, not excavating tons
of soil.
Resistant, but not hyper-accumulating, plants also have
a role in phytoremediation. Organic toxins, those that contain
carbon such as the hydrocarbons found in gasoline and other
fuels, can be broken down by microbial processes. Plants play
a key role in determining the size and health of soil microbial
populations. All plant roots secrete organic materials that
can be used as food for microbes, and this creates a healthier,
larger, more diverse and active microbial population, which
in turn causes a faster breakdown of pollutants. Resistant plants
can thrive on sites that are often too toxic for other plants
to grow. They in turn give the microbial processes the boost
they need to remove organic pollution more quickly from the
soil.
Both forms of phytoremediation have the added benefit of not
disturbing the soil. While excavation is an effective way to
get rid of pollution, it removes the organic matter rich topsoil
and, because of the use of heavy machinery, compacts the soil
that is left behind. Phytoremediation does not degrade the physical
or chemical health of the soil. Actually, it creates a more
fertile soil. Soil organic matter is increased as a result of
root secretions and falling stems and leaves, and the roots
create pores through which water and oxygen can flow. Additionally,
few would argue that a dusty excavation site is more aesthetically
pleasing than a nicely planted field.
There are, however, many limitations to phytoremediation.
It is a slow process that may take many growing seasons before
an adequate reduction of pollution is seen, whereas soil excavation
and treatment cleans up the site quickly. Also, hyper-accumulators
can be a pollution hazard themselves. For instance, animals
can eat the metal rich hyper-accumulators and cause the toxins
to enter the food chain. If the concentration of metals in the
plants is thought to be high enough to cause toxicity, there
must be a way to segregate the plants from humans and wildlife,
which may not be an easy task. Additionally, phytoremediation
is in its infancy, and its effectiveness in cleaning up various
toxins compared to conventional means of treatment is not always
known. However, with more research and practice, the practicality
of using phytoremediation should increase.
The growing popularity of phytoremediation can be seen in the
number of businesses beginning to appear in urban areas of the
United States that are involved in the field. In New Jersey,
a company named Phytotech is using mustard greens to remove
lead from polluted yards in Boston and hydroponically grown
sunflowers to take radioactive metals out of the water surrounding
the Chernobyl nuclear power plant. Right here in Fairfax County,
Edenspace Systems Corp. of Chantilly has more than two
dozen current and future contracts to utilize phytoremediation
in the field, and they even sell an arsenic accumulating Edenfern®
that can be planted in your backyard today.
|